Search This Blog

Wednesday, September 28, 2011

73 Percent Support ‘The Buffett Rule’

73 Percent Support ‘The Buffett Rule’

Ever since President Barack Obama proposed raising taxes on millionaires as part of a debt reduction package, Republicans have been refining their defense for resisting the change. These are the job creators, they argue, and economic growth will be hampered if they have to pay more income to the government. But it looks like they may have to find something more effective.

In the first public polling available on the so-called "Buffett Rule" specifically -- the proposal to raise taxes on millionaires advocated by billionaire investor Warren Buffett -- Daily Kos/SEIU's weekly "State of the Nation" survey asked the following: Do you support or oppose ensuring that people who make over a million dollars a year pay the same percentage of taxes or more on their total income as those who make less than a million dollars a year?

The answer wasn't close.Moncler jackets sale 73 percent supported the idea, versus 16 percent who did not, and 11 percent who were unsure. The poll was of 1,000 registered voters.

Kos took the opportunity to revel in the results:Indeed, every demographic sub-group favors the idea. Republicans back it 66-17.Human hair Full lace wigs Hell, even self-identified tea partiers, the weakest supporters, are at 52-29. Oh, and those making over $100,,Anime supplier,000? 73-16.

In recent polling, voters have shown a willingness to include raising taxes within a plan to address the deificit, and especially on those Americans making $250,000 or more. A recent Pew survey showed 66 percent support for that idea, and 63 percent in a poll from CBS News and the New York Times.digital video recorders The President himself has seemingly grasped on to that sentiment, going on the road promoting his jobs and debt reduction plans with populist rhetoric. It's also further evidence that Obama is distancing himself from the ongoing squabbling of Congress, embracing more popular proposals and taking them directly to voters.

Monday, September 26, 2011

'Leo Nunez' has ID issue

Report: 'Leo Nunez' has ID issue

Florida Marlins closer Leo Nunez has been playing under an assumed name, and the issue prompted him to return Thursday to his native Dominican Republic, two people familiar with his immigration status said.Human hair Full lace wigs

Both people said the Marlins have been aware of the issue for several months. They spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because Dominican and team officials haven't made any public comment on the case.Moncler jackets sale

One of the people said Nunez's real name is Juan Carlos Oviedo and he's 29, a year older than listed in the team media guide.Anime toys merchandise distributor The Marlins placed Nunez on Major League Baseball's restricted list,digital video recorders and he isn't expected to pitch in the final week of the season.

His agent, Andy Mota, declined to comment. The Marlins traveled Thursday to Milwaukee for their final road series of the season.

Nunez has 36 saves and a 4.06 ERA in 68 games this year. His ERA was 2.59 in late May but is 6.00 since then.

The right-hander has an effective changeup and a fastball that reaches 97 mph, and in three seasons with Florida he has 92 saves. He pitched a scoreless ninth inning in Wednesday's victory over Atlanta.

Nunez, who is married, turned professional in 2000 when he signed with the Pittsburgh Pirates. He was traded to Kansas City in late 2004 and made his major league debut with the Royals the following season. The Marlins traded for him after the 2008 season.

According to his Marlins biography, he was born in Jamao al Norte, Dominican Republic, and lives in Bonao.

Nunez will be in his final year of arbitration after this season and was expected to make about $6 million in 2012. Even before the issue regarding his identity surfaced, it was unclear whether the Marlins would try to re-sign him.

The players' association had not immediately determined whether to challenge the Marlins' decision to place him on the restricted list, a person familiar with the union's deliberations said. The person spoke on condition of anonymity because the union had not made any public statements.